*************************************************************************** Will Zuzak; DEMANUK.007 = 1992-08-16 letter to IAJLJ; 1993-09-22 *************************************************************************** Dear Subscribers: I expect that John Demjanjuk is now safely home in Cleveland. Thank God! The next step is to have his citizenship restored, which may be quite difficult, since Attorney General Janet Reno has publicly stated that she will attempt to have him deported from the United States. When the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reopened the John Demjanjuk case on June 6, 1992, after the OSI had failed to respond to repeated requests for information, an International Association of Jewish Lawyers wrote a brief beseeching the Court not to do so for fear of compromising the memory of the HOLOCAUST. The following letter written to the signator summarizes my feelings on the OSI and the Israeli courts: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 16 August, 1992 Nathan Lewin Miller, Cassidy, Larroca & Lewin 255 M Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037 (202)293-6400 Dear Mr. Lewin: It was with the deepest disappointment that I read your brief dated August 1992 to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in the case of John Demjanjuk vs Joseph Petrovsky et al (No. 85-3435). Your overriding concern appears to be to exact vengeance in honor of the victims of the Jewish Holocaust during World War II. I would submit that the Jewish victims would be appalled to have an innocent man hanged in their honor. John Demjanjuk was charged with being a sadistic guard called Ivan Grozny in Treblinka during 1942-43. Despite the identification by five eyewitnesses, it is now perfectly clear that John Demjanjuk was never in Treblinka. The eye witnesses either deliberately lied or were "conditioned" by illegitimate photo-identification procedures to make the "appropriate" choice. This latter explanation is convincingly documented by William A. Wagenaar in his book "Identifying Ivan: A Case Study in Legal Psychology". The Office of Special Investigations (OSI) of the U.S. Department of Justice does not possess any of the positive features you attribute to it. There is ample evidence to support charges of "miscarriage of justice" and "fraud". Even to accuse the OSI of "prosecutorial misconduct" and "obstruction of justice" is too mild. What the OSI has done to John Demjanjuk and his family is pure unadulterated evil. It is 100% certain that the OSI had knowledge and/or documents in its possession indicating that John Demjanjuk was not the guard Ivan Grozny before the denaturalization trial in 1981. Yet, it conspired to conceal this evidence during those proceedings, the subsequent extradition proceedings in 1985 and even the trial in Jerusalem in 1987. Rather than condoning the criminal actions of the OSI, one would have hoped that the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists would be at the forefront in demanding that perpetrators of this evil be brought to justice. After people like Allan Ryan Jr., Neil Sher and Norman Moscowitz have spent as many years in solitary confinement as John Demjanjuk, than justice will have been served. And should Mr. Demjanjuk die while still incarcerated in Israel, or as a result thereof, then they should be charged with murder. To state that "the courts of Israel are fully capable and eminently qualified to evaluate the evidence" is a joke. The Jerusalem trial of John Demjanjuk during 1987 and early 1988 is most reminiscent of the Stalinist show trials in the former Soviet Union. The whole process was orchestrated in an atmosphere of hysteria and hatred. The judges disallowed key evidence presented by the defense. Certain relevant questioning of the witnesses was forbidden. The whole trial was carried out consistent with the guilt of the defendant. The Verdict written by the three judges, Levin, Dorner and Tal, is a complete distortion of the evidence presented. No honest person who reads the 17000 pages of testimony would come to the conclusion of guilty as they did. They even had the audacity to brag that "their" trial had a more unbelievable script than any Hollywood movie! When these judges have been removed from the bench and served several years of solitary confinement equivalent to that served by John Demjanjuk since April 18, 1988, then Israel's courts will have earned a "reputation for fairness". "Justice, justice shalt thou pursue" Yours truly William Zuzak Charitable Committee in Aid of John Demjanjuk's Family cc: Demjanjuk/Nishnic IAJLJ *************************************************************************** Will Zuzak; DEMANUK.007 = 1992-08-16 letter to IAJLJ; 1993-09-22 ***************************************************************************